THE ACCOUTREMENT OF DEATH
The Newman Brothers Coffin Fitting Works left such an
impression upon me that I felt compelled to offer this tribute to the history
and the people who worked in this wonderful death-related business.
I hope you enjoy this 1.5 minute video. Please turn up your volume.
Paul Cripps of bitesizevideo is responsible for the visual
magic and editing.
A VISIT TO
THE VICTORIAN COFFIN FURNITURE FACTORY
In a subtle, creeping moment I realized that my life was not
normal. No other child in my class slept above a room full of caskets. To
descend the stairs in our house meant discovering who might be lying in one of
those open caskets, a reposed, powdered face ready for viewing. No child I knew
looked forward to a visit to the cemetery, or was subjected to sitting in long
stretches of silence while a funeral service droned on downstairs, the organ
music signalling The End notes.
Since then I have sought the unusual without much thought
that the draw emanated from that languid funeral home, a dot on the map of the
American South. I could never foresee that once I left my father’s house of
death, I would one day stand in a remarkable historic coffin fittings
factory in Birmingham, England.
When I first read of the existence of the Newman Brothers
Coffin Furniture Factory I experienced a mighty magnetic pull to discover what
was sure to be a treasure. When I realized the goal of the talented people at
the Birmingham Conservation Trust, I felt a strong urge to shout:
LISTEN UP! THERE ARE EXTRAORDINARY PLANS UNDERWAY TO CREATE
BRITAIN’S FIRST FUNEREAL MUSEUM.
In 1894 raw materials arrived via the Birmingham Fazeley
Canal to the yard doors of 13-15 Fleet Street, a short street then full of
manufacturers. Today, Newman Brothers is the last to stand, the only complete
historic building left, gloriously sandwiched between the towering jagged
modern buildings that now dominate the street.
Its almost hidden position faces east where light streams
into the small paned cast iron windows of the three-story Victorian building
and into the windows of the rebuilt 1960s two-story building.
This was the setting where for over one hundred years
artisan funereal work was accomplished to such a high standard that the coffin
fittings produced here, from raw material to finished product, were world
famous and seen on the coffins of Churchill, the Queen Mother and Princess
Diana.
Winston Churchill's coffin is lowered into the grave at
Bladon Graveyard
In an atmosphere where everyone felt part of a family, and
wherein a large number of females were employed, like Diamond Lil who read
teacups, and Dolly who was a little deaf, employees are well remembered in
photographs and in the palpable oral history arm of the project. Polishers,
stampers, and piercers are brought to life through interviews and the products
they created in the Grade II listed building.
Stamp Room
Though Newman Brothers had plans to begin manufacturing
coffins, the plans never came to fruition; however, from the mid twentieth
century they began manufacturing burial shrouds and coffin linings.
When the factory was sold in 2003 everything was left in
situ, as if the entire company had just stepped out to lunch. Thousands of
artefacts littered the rooms. Along with stock, manufacturing tools and
equipment, items of poignancy were startling. Overalls hung on a hook. A
woman’s handbag was left behind. Tea making accoutrement stood at the ready,
and the tongs for making toast hung by the fireside.
The Newman Brothers travelling salesman's bag, fully stocked.
Imagine Mr. Allen on his Triumph motorbike, his samples bags
filled with breast plates, coffin handles, crucifixes, catalogues and shroud
material, all tucked away in the wickerwork sidecar and headed all over England
and Ireland where his was the first motorbike to travel many of its roads.
When I was a child I often watched my father polish the
handles of one of his many caskets. Not that they needed this extra care; the
casket and its fittings arrived in perfect condition. Could any of them have
possibly originated from Newman Brothers?
And how many ways might one use a casket handle? They make a
nice paperweight, or door handle…
The plans for the museum are terrifically ambitious. The use
of film, sound, an iBook interactive element, special hands on activities for
children, object interpretation, to name only a few mediums, will contribute to
create one of the premier examples of how a Victorian factory actually worked,
while simultaneously showing the changes in the business of death and funerary
rituals from the Victorian era to the present.
The renovation has begun and next year 13-15 Fleet Street
will be home to its own unique jewel in The Jewellery Quarter of Birmingham.
Many thanks to my guide, the brilliantly informed volunteer
Barbara Nomikos who deftly lead me room by room, step by step through the
fascinating pre-renovated world of funeral furniture manufacturing. Grateful
thanks also to Suzanne Carter of the Birmingham Conservation Trust for
permissions and introductions.
MEMENTO MORI:
Alive and Well in SoHo
“Our graveyards have been planted next to churches...so
that women, children and lesser folk should grow accustomed to seeing a dead
man without feeling terror, and so that this continual spectacle of bones,
tombs and funerals should remind us of our human conditions.”
Michel de Montaigne
Pertwee Anderson and Gold, and The Museum of Curiosity have
collaborated on an exhibition that explores objects of memento mori. An
astonishing variety of artists boldly ask viewers to contemplate their
mortality through their work. I went along to have a look. I
stepped into an intimate SoHo gallery where I left the bright glare of day and
was at once enveloped in the tomb-like dark grey walls. Pointed, effective
lighting enhanced the works of art. I’ve selected a few that were particularly
striking, though any one item in the collection is more than worthy of a visit.
The following were created by Jim Skull. (I know!) Jim Skull
is influenced and inspired by the “strong cultural heritages of Africa, New
Zealand, Asia and Oceania”.
Papier mache skull, antique beads, murano black glass
Papier mache skull, antique cannetille
Papier
mache skull, artificial flowers, taxidermy bird and insects, gold leaf
Papier mache skull, artificial flowers, taxidermy bird and
insects, gold leaf
All of the above images Copyright Jim Skull, courtesy of
Pertwee Anderson & Gold
Franklyn
and Brendan Connor are twins and artists who grew up in an extreme Christian
cult known as ‘The Family’, the same cult that included the actors River and
Joaquin Phoenix. When Franklyn and Brendan were sixteen they ran away. As they
learned about the outside world they communicated with each other about what
they discovered with notebooks and sketchpads, which resulted in their special
form of making art together.
Death Calls
Acrylic on canvas
Image Copyright The Conner Brothers, courtesy of Pertwee
Anderson & Gold
This piece by Tasha Marks in collaboration with David Bradley and Annabel de Vetten is
one of my favourites. It drew me in quite innocently and then I discovered…it’s
edible.
Edible
Vanitas Case
Mixed media including chocolate, sugar, marshmallows, apples, pears and
ambergris
Image Copyright Tasha Marks, courtesy of Pertwee Anderson
& Gold
Nancy Fouts’s work has been seen in the Victoria and Albert
Museum, among many others, and has been endorsed by Banksy. In her words,
"I hoard stuff in boxes and then I lay it all out and many ideas happen
like that." Ms. Fouts is originally from, ahem, Kentucky.
Hang on
Medical skeleton, resin, rope and paint
Freedom is Overrated
Taxidermy bird, perspex, dome, black wood and glass display
case
Images Copyright Nancy Fouts, courtesy of Pertwee Anderson
& Gold
“The decision to erase paintings painted by other artists
came partly from graffiti,” says artist Paul Stephenson. “The paintings I use,
my surface, have already existed fully as objects.” When asked by Garage
Magazine to what he is particularly drawn: “Paintings that have a recognisable, iconic format and a
clear subject. That is why I have worked a lot with 17th - 19th century
portraiture as it has this iconic quality. We know the framework of these
portraits so well that even when the central subject is erased we know what
should be there and we begin to imagine it.”
No lady,
Oil off canvas
Image Copyright Paul Stephenson, courtesy of Pertwee
Anderson & Gold
Prepare yourself now for another sibling duo, Jake and Dinos
Chapman, whose work is sometimes described as the anatomical and pornographic
grotesque.
Migraine
Cast human
skull, resin and oil paint
Side View
Image Copyright Jake and Dinos Chapman, courtesy of Pertwee
Anderson & Gold
To end, a
gentler image by Michal Ohana-Cole whose “art practice instigates the
complex everlasting relationship between money, death and sexuality as well as
the notion that one inevitably controls the other.”
Godspeed you (No.13), 2013
Pigment print
Memento Mori is on exhibit until June 14.
CLOWNING AROUND AT THE FUNERAL HOME
People often ask me if I was frightened growing up in a
funeral home. Yes, I was. But not for reasons you might think.
When an entire month passed in its lazy way and no one died – that was scary. Caskets to buy, hearses to maintain, and all that. I overheard my parents’ tense voices discussing the competition, revealing that, no - Alfred hadn’t received a death call all month, either. It was like death held its breath. I thought of the stillness in that.
I’ll tell you what else scared me - Petal the clown. Every year when the woody scent of autumn pranced through the air, the participants of the Tobacco Festival Parade gathered around the corner from our funeral home. Main Street transformed into a circus-like atmosphere, as if we’d all gathered under the Big Top. At eight o’clock in the morning beauty pageant contestants in satin evening gowns climbed atop the floats, shivering as they shielded their bouffants from the breeze. In the moments leading up to the start of the parade, organizers barked instructions over the drumbeats of the high school bands as they warmed up. All was chaos as parade goers and participants scrambled to their places.
Just before the convertible carrying the Grand Marshall began to roll down Main Street, several participants broke ranks to answer the call of nature. It was inevitable; they’d been waiting for hours. Many would pop into one of the three churches on our block, and a few rushed into our funeral home where, unless we were “busy”, our house of mourning hosted a jolly, excited bunch.
Just when the funeral home became quite again, a clown came lumbering in with minutes to spare in a wave of sweat and the stale, rank odour of a bender. I’d never seen a clown in person before, though I’d noticed signs in larger towns.
I was expecting someone colourful, happy and, well, funny.
His morning stubble grew out of the white patchy makeup. The
sinister red smile was a bit runny with his perspiration, his teeth long and
yellow. ‘Petal’ had become smeared on his nametag. The all-in-one-clown suit,
dingy from wear and too few washes, billowed out, something like this:
Petal walked with a deliberate and heavy step towards me in
flat exaggerated shoes.
He bent down,
his macabre face in mine. “Where’s your bathroom?” he asked in a gruff,
demanding voice.
I screamed. He grabbed me by both arms, “What’s wrong with you, girl? Where is it?” I pointed, then ran to find my father who was outside filming the crowd before he, too, would enter the parade driving the love of his life, a 1937 Roadmaster Buick.
Meanwhile, Petal, was taking an awfully long time. My father
said it had something to do with his costume. I couldn’t imagine. He stumbled
out with a curse, the tip of one of those long shoes fought with the carpet.
A half hour later, when the parade was in full swing, Petal sauntered by the funeral home waving to the crowd, throwing candy to children. He pulled out a horn with a large rubber bulb at the end of it from a deep pocket, aimed it at me, and honked. There was something mean about it.
THE HAPPY-GO-LUCKY FUNERAL PARLOUR
Late in the afternoon, possibly the coldest London has seen
this year, I headed for the second time in a month to Drury Lane.
I think it was Dickens’ Sketches By Boz in which I first read of Drury Lane in his essay,
Gin-Shops:
“we will make for Drury-Lane, through the narrow
streets and dirty courts which divide it from Oxford-street, and that classical
spot adjoining the brewery at the bottom of Tottenham Court Road, best known to
the initiated as the Rookery."
I would have been in high school in Kentucky when I read
about gin shops, a rookery and the wretched houses teeming with the whole of
humanity in its less than humane state. A setting so completely foreign to me,
this Drury Lane, that my only point of reference would have been a little
moonshine shack in the backwoods of our “dry” county.
How strange then that I set off with purpose the other day
to discover what lay behind the ornately flanked door of the Happy-Go-Lucky
Funeral Parlour on Drury Lane.
In vain I had already searched Google for a phone number, a
website, something, anything I could use to contact them in advance to make an
appointment. I had hopes of an interview with an undertaker who I’d already
imagined as kind and respectful.
(If you don’t already know, I grew up in a funeral home.)
Nothing. I found no information whatsoever - this should have
been a warning of some kind. What sort of funeral home doesn’t want to be
found?
I arrived to find the entrance shuttered.
What a disappointment. I stood shivering for a few minutes
before I walked away towards Longacre. Then I stopped halfway down the street.
What a wimp, what a wuss I was. How silly to give up so quickly. I did an
about-face, marched back and opened the door to a shop across the street from
the Happy-Go-Lucky. Full to the brim with artist supplies, brushes sprouting from
every corner, a young woman emerged from the back to greet me.
“I’m sorry to disturb you, but do you know anything about
the funeral parlour across the street?”
“As a matter of fact, I just tried to Google them the other
day and couldn’t find out a thing.”
“Yes, I tried that, too. Zero.”
“I’ve never even seen anyone come out of there,” she said.
“Oh, I have. On Valentine’s Day. I walked by with two
friends and a man stepped out of the funeral parlour holding a broom. He wished
us a Happy Valentine’s Day. That’s why I came back. Life does exist in there
somewhere.”
She laughed.
I crossed the street and again had almost given up when I
began to snoop around the restaurant next door to the Happy-Go-Lucky. There are
velvet-cushioned seats, the kind that are normally tucked underneath a lady’s
dressing table, framed in floral displays and set along the wall of the
building. They looked forlorn outside in the cloudy cold. Overly dramatic
arches of greenery created a covered path to the restaurant’s entrance.
I stepped inside and was immediately visually accosted by
the lavish décor. It was late afternoon, before the magic of the light of the
numerous chandeliers struck the glassware. The tired, cheap designs and
gimmicks were apparent; a mix of Gothic, Rococo and others I didn’t recognize.
It looked like the morning after of a bacchanalia of decorators. Then it struck me that the murals
bore a curious similarity to the painting above the funeral parlour’s entrance.
It was quiet in the restaurant, no customers yet filled the
elaborate balcony seating, the opera boxes, or the long tables set for the
evening – the place was huge. A waiter approached and when he heard my
questions he referred me to yet another waiter who finally introduced me to the
hostess. An older woman who had been sitting in a dark corner watching me rose
and made her way toward me.
“Do you know anything about the funeral home next door?”
“No, no,” she said in a thick accent that I couldn’t quite
place, her language formal. “It is not a funeral home. It is our office.”
“Ah. I see. Why, then? Why do you advertise it as a funeral
home?”
“It is just a joke. We think it is funny. You know, most funeral
homes – they are so serious.”
I began to feel a bit sour.
I put my gloves back on and as I did so these were her last
words to me:
“Please do not die in here. We will not be able to take care
of you.”
WIDOW BURNING
My undertaker father never cremated a body. Our small town,
an insular Southern community, had no crematorium and was pro burial, as were
most small towns at that time. During my childhood cremation was thought of as
distasteful and unnatural; the practice was spoken of in whispers. Only upon
one occasion, that I recall, did a family request that their patriarch be
cremated. On that day, my father drove the corpse to another town an hour away,
the nearest dot on the map to fulfil the family’s wishes.
My imagination went wild: How did the skin burn? What do flaming muscles look like?
How long did it take? Was there an odour?
I finally moved away from that house of death, and as an
adult quickly adjusted and embraced cremation as a wholly valid choice. Other
departures from the conventional casket burial have emerged; natural, or green
burials, biodegradable coffins, and so on. But sometimes I still stumble upon a
death ritual that challenges my strongly held value of live and let live. This
was the case when I learned of the ancient custom of widow burning.
“…loosening their hair, and unveiling their faces,
they went to the gate of zenåna, and presented themselves before the assembled
populace. All opposition to their wishes now ceased. They were regarded as
sacred to the departed monarch. Devout ejaculations poured incessantly from
their lips. Their movements became invested with a mysterious significance; and
their words were treasured up as prophetic.
Meantime the pile had been prepared. The eight
victims, dressed in their richest attire, and mounted on horseback, moved with
procession to the cemetery. There they stripped off their ornaments and jewels,
distributed gifts to the bystanders, and lastly, mounting the pile, they took
their places beside the corpse. As the Maharåna had left no son, his nephew,
the present Sovereign, applied the torch. The crash of music, the chanting of
the priests, and the cries of the multitude arose simultaneously, and the
tragedy was consummated.”
“The Sacrifice of Sati”, by two queens and six concubines in
India on the 30th of August, 1888 as described in WIDOW-BURNING by
Henry Jeffryes Bushby.
The term Suttee, or Sati, is applied to the person; the act
or the rite of widow burning is Sahagamana. An expert in ancient civilizations
tells me that many peoples have had a custom of sacrificing the dependents of
the dead including servants and slaves. In addition, other authorities believe
that Scythians gave birth to the idea of voluntary death, or “sacrifice” of the
deceased’s widow specifically, and planted the seeds of the practice in lands
they settled. In India, where Sahagamana was most prominently practiced, its
birth is traced in 300 BC. In
Eastern Europe, especially in the Ukraine and South Russia, the Scythians
practiced the ritual in the 6th to the 4th century B.C.
In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, no
travel to India was complete without a reference to the Sati by a steady flow
of eyewitness accounts. While many widows threw themselves upon the pyre
voluntarily, many did not. The use of drugs, force and restraints to prevent
escape were witnessed in horror. The woman was bound by cord, or in many
instances, bamboo poles were used to push her down on top of her husband, or
logs were thrown upon the woman as she lay on top of him. A Sati might be
soaked in camphor, or ghee might be poured on her. It was reported that
in an effort to shorten her suffering, a widow’s face was painted red with a
mix of gunpowder and sulphur. Incense burned in concert with her flesh.
The practice was labelled as a voluntary sacrifice, a
“supreme test of conjugal devotion” and the widow often paraded to her death in
a bride’s dress among a crowd of thousands. The Sati should not solely be imagined
as an elderly woman, but quite literally in many cases, a child-bride.
No religious sanction was ever attached to Sahagamana – all
was superstition. There were reports of women who might have initially
committed voluntarily, who then lost courage and fled the fire only to be
thrown in by the crowd. In stark contrast in 1789-1814, other witnesses, both men and women, described how peaceful the Sati appeared and how the rite was
performed “with great sensitivity”. As if those who pushed the widow into the
flames extended a tender hand.
Sahagamana was to be found among many castes and at all
social levels. By the end of the eighteenth century the practice was banned by
European powers, but the ban was ignored, and though efforts have been made to
reinforce laws against it, the most recent known case was in 1999. Much
controversy surrounds this particular widow’s final act, as she was not known
to have any desire to become a Sati. There were accusations of her having been
coerced.
Sacrifice. Murder. Suicide. How best to categorize this
ancient ritual? Is it even accurate to define it as a ritual? The Hindu Times
in 2010 refers to it as the “Sati system” wherein it describes this memorial
Sati stone that dates back to 1057, and has been carved with pictorial
representation.
More often palm prints are a typical
memorial used to honour the Sati.
The Sati stones can be found in the outskirts of the villages all over India. At times they’re placed at the spot where the widow became `Sati`. Unfortunately, the sculptures don’t tell us if the Sati walked willingly to her death.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)